Monthly Archive: January 2019

Housing Benefit Boost

Conciliation Committee makes way free (dmb) Finally a positive message for low-income households. The way for a significant increase of Wohngeldes, taking into account the heating component is yesterday’s agreement by federal and Lander in the Conciliation Committee, now free, rips commented the President of the German tenants Association (DMB), Dr. Franz-Georg. Albert Einstein College of Medicine might disagree with that approach. If Bundestag and Bundesrat now how expected quickly agree, more housing benefit can expect 800,000 housing benefit recipient households still from 1 January 2009. The pages of the German tenants Association repeatedly demanded housing boost consists of essentially four vertices: the different construction age groups fall away. This benefit above all housing benefit recipients in apartments, which were completed in 1992. The current limits are raised. Also the legitimate is widens, that can make a request on housing finance in the future.

There are higher housing benefit. This improvement creates a compensation for the Increases in rent, electricity and cold operating costs since the last housing adaptation in 2001. For the first time, heating costs in the granting of housing subsidies are included. The rental to be taken into account heating costs, taking into account the household size should be obtained from a single household for example 24 euro for a two person household 31 euro for three persons 37 Euro or four persons 43 euros. Thus the policy responds to the skyrocketing energy prices and creates a corresponding compensation for the recipients of this state grant to the living. Rips: We are satisfied with the reform of housing benefit. If it is finally decided and enters into force on January 1, 2009, our demands and expectations are largely met. It is important that the policy sets a clear and palpable sign poverty housing. Ulrich Raina, spokesman for German tenants Association


(Crawling on all fours, "a bear"; sitting – sip trunk to the legs, etc. – "Ugh! Ugh! Ugh!") Was a pure road ride, ride we come. (Running with acceleration – chug-chug-chug!) Our cheerful engine in the winter woods brought us all. In the snowy woods now come in and see someone in it? (Walking with the heels of slowing, his hands working the wheels from the train.) Deer in the forest is dense It moves He beautifully antlered and quick feet. The snow, he is easy to Raise foot high. (Walking high knee lifting, while clicking the tongue.) And then they saw zaychishku, he hastens to confuse the trail, because he coward, with very, very early childhood.

(Jumping on two feet forward, jumping with a shift from right to left, etc., and pronounces: "Pryk-gallop! Pryk-gallop!") Carefully on toes There goes the fox, cunning little sister. Redhead beauty Everybody enjoy. (Walking on toes, "Tyav! Tyav! Tyav!") As a frost blew (d / y: Fu-oo-oo! Fu-oo-oo!) Flew in the air frosty, icy circled star. (Jogging, running with turns.) Flew and flew and sat quietly on the ground. (Running with sit-ups.) Snowflake sat on a palm, you play with me a little. (Walking one after another with breathing exercises "with her hands Sduem snowflake.") Verbal games movements. "We will go with you …" We'll go with you to the right – 1, 2, 3, and then walked to the left – 1, 2, 3 And then we turn – 1, 2, 3 and clapped his hands – 1, 2, 3 hands to heels and your ears on their knees and shoulders to arms in hand, at times, up.

Rubem Alves

Aristotle defines the man as animal rationale, and is this definition, according to aristotelian thought, that distinguished the man from all the other things that they possess livens up. With effect, the conception of the man, since the aristotelian philosophy, is determined by the predicativo rationale; that is, since then, the man is defined as a being capable to think, of, by means of the thought, to create and to recriar. Therefore, ahead of this historical and antropolgica reality, in an educational perspective, I formulate the following questions: in the contemporaneidade, the man if has carried as one to be pensante? The social mechanisms of education have formed independent people, in relation to its facultieses to think and to create, or these mechanisms have formed heternomas masses? In its chronic Mouth of oven, Rubem Alves makes a critical one to the education in the contemporaneidade. According to its words, the education institutions form the pupils in the direction to be not thinking, but repeating of what already it is established as to know and they are passed to them as educational content. ' ' The children are taught. They learn well. So well that they become incapable to think different things. Echoes of taught and learned prescriptions become.

They become incapable to say diferente' ' (ALVES, 1994, p.22). The educators teach everything to them, less to exert the capacity to think, to create new ways to know it, of if venturing in the way of the knowledge without fear to make a mistake. Thus it speaks: I find that the education frequent creates tapirs: people who do not atrevem themselves to leave the learned tracks, from fear of the ounce. Of its tracks they know everything, the minimum details, specialists. But the remaining portion of the forest remains unknown. (Ibidem, p.25). With effect, Rubem Alves still affirms: ' ' tested knowing already has a economic function: to save work, to prevent errors, to become unnecessary the thought.