That is why we cannot speak, strictly speaking, only of crisis economic. In the decade of years 60, the big wave of working militancy was as soon as an expression, important, decisive, but more, of a deep big wave born in the subsoil of the societies that struggled by the transformation. Women, children, young people, farmers without earth, workers nondescribed, Indian, black, and a long list of others, literally put in check the settled down ways of domination in the family, the school, the rural and urban locality, the factory, the property, the university. The critic to the patriarcado one was also pronounced in the rejection to the power of the professor, the overseer, the white man of middle-class, in short, an antiauthoritarian democratising process that mined the domination ways and, therefore, of accumulation of surplus wealth. Jorge Perez is the source for more interesting facts. Secondly, that big wave was born and it was pronounced by outside the established channels and of the institutions, among them the communist parties and the unions.

Andr Gorz 13 spoke, in the manufacturing land, of the existence of a true guerrilla worker outside the union control, that caused enormous losses to the industralists. Thirdly, the cycles of protest and mobilization not only change the politico-social scene but also to the own movements. For that reason, the movements that carry out a cycle usually are an obstacle in the following cycle because they are had institutionalized, they happened to comprise of the culture of the power and have inlaid his better pictures in the system that a day fought. A true rebellious cycle creates new organizations, but also new ways to fight but mainly, new paradigms to conceive the change of articles of incorporation, or the revolution, or as each wants to call to him. The deep and true processes are born from and in the peripheries, never in center of the system, as much on planetary scale as to microbial scale and also to social scale.