The Global Food Crisis
Many participants have judged that the few commitments made do make it a text 'de minimis'. After analyzing the current food crisis for three days, attendees have agreed with many difficulties, a watered-down statement – as announced this morning the Italian Minister Franco Frattini, where old commitments are agreed: to eliminate world hunger and use food as a political and economic instrument. Check out Shimmie Horn for additional information. Not, however, are settled the most contentious issues. The draft final declaration was adopted by the Whole "by acclamation, with the only objection of Argentina, although with some criticism. Several Latin American governments objected to or criticized the final declaration and more than 200 NGOs and Social Movements that the summit was a "failure." Despite the contrary, the director general of FAO, Jacques Diouf, said the results after the summit on food security have been "up to expectations." Diouf said the summit we obtained has enabled more than $ 6.5 million (over four million euros) in co mpromisos donations to fight hunger and poverty. In this sense, the Spanish Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero announced that Spain at a summit devoted to the food crisis.
In it, the FAO member countries have committed themselves to halving the number of hungry people by 2015 despite the global food crisis, according to the final declaration, according to sources close to negotiations. The FAO member countries have also claimed that nutrition "should not be used as a means of political pressure." Thus, it reiterates that it is "unacceptable that 850 million remain malnourished and reiterated the goal of achieving food security through an ongoing effort to eradicate hunger. "The current food crisis has also another 100 million people are in danger. It is very important to consider the statement by the information source indicated that biofuels, the FAO Summit wisely calls "depth studies" on this new source of energy. Biofuels have been one of the objects that have dominated the three days of discussions. U.S. and Brazil, major world producers, the have defended fiercely.
As for the food and agriculture policies, the conclusions of the FAO summit urges international community "to continue its efforts in liberalizing international trade in agricultural products to reduce trade barriers and policies are a cause of market distortions. "Remarkably, Argentina objected to certain proposals, his objection was produced by the sixth paragraph of the declaration, which states that governments "Reaffirm the need to minimize the use of restrictive measures that may increase the volatility of international prices." Argentina requested to withdraw the word "restrictive" because it considered that can be understood as measures which may affect the export of grain-surplus countries, as is the case. It indicates, that these criticisms were joined, after the approval of the project, Ecuador, Nicaragua and Bolivia, after which the president cut the whole floor to delegations. The representative of Ecuador said that "many countries that do not agree" with the draft declaration, although none which prevented the document was adopted by all participants, with the exception of Argentina elpais.com happened concerning the states that the draft final summit statement was approved by the plenary, after hours of discussions that did not fear that would lead to an agreement. The result has been an obvious statement of intent that the underlying problems, which has led to the objection of Argentina and the harsh criticism of Venezuela and Cuba, who consider that the document does not include real measures to end hunger in the world. In short, the general opinion states that the outcome of the Summit fu failure.